Blog
Categories
Apple’s CORE Hypocrisy – Setting a World Record in Late Disclosure
Apple’s CORE Hypocrisy – Setting a World Record in Late Disclosure
As I have documented elsewhere, Apple, for quite a long time has been engaged in a sophisticated long-term quest to devalue (p7) standard essential patents (“Essential Patents”).
Meet the IP Thought Leaders: Eric M. Sarver, Esq.
Meet the IP Thought Leaders: Eric M. Sarver, Esq.
Over the course of my 20+ years practicing law, I have had the honor of working with many individuals at the cutting edge of all aspects of intellectual property.
Identifying Trade Secrets With Reasonable Particularity (Continued)
Identifying Trade Secrets With Reasonable Particularity (Continued)
So much for the case law. But what is a trade secret owner to do — both in the case and proactively before the case commences
The Real FRAND Scam Part 3
The Real FRAND Scam Part 3
Previously we discussed a Unified Patents’ article, the “FRAND SCAM” fails to address many key points.
The Real FRAND Scam Part 2
The Real FRAND Scam Part 2
Previously we addressed some of the key omissions in Unified Patents’ article “FRAND SCAM.”
The Real FRAND Scam Part 1
The Real FRAND Scam Part 1
Last month, Unified Patents, also known as a PTAB reverse troll, launched its new service called Unified Consulting.
Identifying Trade Secrets With Reasonable Particularity
Identifying Trade Secrets With Reasonable Particularity
As we have written previously, during the course of a United States litigation — whether, under the new, federal Defend Trade Secrets Act (DTSA) or the older state-adopted Uniform Trade Secrets Act (UTSA)
IPlytics’ Patent-Counting Fallacy
IPlytics’ Patent-Counting Fallacy
There is no doubt that the number of patents declared as potentially essential to technical standards is not an indication of essentiality; its only purpose is to make those declared patents accessible on FRAND terms should they ever become essential.